Blog 2
After reading the three metaphor’s of Literacy, this quote stuck out the most in my mind as being critical in understanding literacy. “The concept of functional literacy make sense only with respect to proficiencies required for participation in the actual life conditions of particular communities or groups.” (Gray; Hunter and Harman) If you have no functional need to learn, for example another language like Japanese if your not living or plan on living in Japan then the desire (personal drive) to become fluent may become stagnant over the course of time.
Only after living aboard for several years, do i understand how difficult it is to adapt to a different mode of literacy, many of the various aspects of “industrialized” literacy were unless to me aboard causing more problems than they solved. Its the need to adapt to our every change societal standards that drives our desire to participate in “…mundane situational demands.” Does a basic fundamental teaching of literacy maintain a basic self motivation; one which we use to learn only what we need to get by? According to Scribner “Basic educational programs have a obligation to equip adults with the skills they must have to secure jobs or advance to better ones.”
Literacy has to be “Functional” to the individuals of varying social back grounds, if there is no more of a need to learn how to write a check, if one doesn’t have a bank account then wheres the motivation for the individual to want to adapt or adhere to these standards.