Reading together

Perusall logoWe’ll use Perusall to annotate and read together.

Instructions for joining on the Assignments page.

 

Calendar

 

Time photoOur course invites you to work with data collection and analysis, readings, and discussion around the field of literacy studies

Author: Carmel

Who's afraid of the big, bad wolf?
So Long, Farewell

So Long, Farewell

Coming into this course, I had no idea what to expect.  I didn’t have an idea of what I could possibly learn in a literacy course.  In the beginning I thought of literacy simply as being “am I literate or not.”  That is, can I read or can’t I.  This class really changed that for me.  Literacy is not a black and white subject.  You can’t break it down into the haves and the have-nots.  It is completely dependent upon the individuals being observed.  What literacy is to me, may not be literacy to someone else.  For example, I work with a Mexican man who is illiterate in both English and Spanish.  However, after years of working at a restaurant, he is now able to work on the line in the kitchen because he learned how to read our order tickets.  He would not be able to read a full page out of a book to me, but he is more than able to shout at me from across the kitchen to drop more shrimp in the fryer because he read it off a ticket.  His literacy does not include literature- as mine does- or articles on the internet- as mine does- but rather food orders.

While I am unsure if I would like to be a teacher one day, I can see how important it would be if I became one.  It is absolutely necessary to be able to assess what an individuals literacy is in order to teach them appropriately. The group projects we presented demonstrate these individual needs well.  We learn best through interacting with our subject matter, so we must find personal ways to do so.  My group worked with gaming and learning, and it made me think about how many computer programs I used growing up that taught me school subjects.  I grew up playing math games, reading games, typing games, and vividly remember learning from these games.  The other groups also reminded me of all the different things I’ve learned and which ones stuck with me because I did them in an interesting, worthwhile way.

While working on my group project, I watched several videos and read many articles on computer literacy in the classroom.  While it is not a traditional form of teaching or schooling, it is absolutely becoming a necessity.  Computer literacy is crucial to the modern job market.  Since technology is so prevalent– as a society we are constantly “plugged in” to some kind of device, be it a phone, tablet, or computer– we must know how to work with it.  Had I come into this class, specifically, not knowing how to work a computer or navigate the interwebs, I would have been completely lost and unable to participate in a majority of it.

 

Word to Your Literacy Studies

Word to Your Literacy Studies

The biggest take-away I got from the presentations is how many creative, interesting ways there are to teach. The interactive approaches demonstrated in class seem far more effective than the average lecture and practice.  My favorite presentation was definitely the rap group. It really requires the students that are writing raps to think about whatever subject they’re dealing with. They have to know the information in depth in order to create an effective and creative flow. I watch videos on YouTube called Epic Rap Battles of History that demonstrate this idea perfectly. The link below is of one that I’ve watched so many times that I’ve inadvertently memorized it.

 

Just Girls

Just Girls

Just Girls was essentially a year long ethnographic study on two groups of girls at a Jr. High School.  One way in which this helps us to understand literacy studies is by showing how many different forms of literacy there are.  The author included things like passing notes, writing on the bathroom walls, and magazines in the category of literacy.  It also showed how literacy functions as a social category because there were different forms of literacy being used in both separate groups.  My group talked a lot about the social differences between the two groups.  The Tough Cookies used literacy as a way of isolating themselves (i.e. reading silently to themselves) while the Social Queens used it to communicate and relate to each other (i.e. passing notes and sharing books).

Literacy: A Social Necessity.

Literacy: A Social Necessity.

When I think of “a social view of literacy,” what comes to mind is how Brandt wrote “By the end of nineteenth century, the ability to read was no longer regarded as an avenue to morality but rather as an indication of moral behavior itself (just as illiteracy became- in and of itself- an indication of antisocial or immoral behavior).”  To be illiterate- truly and completely unable to read or write- would isolate a person, or indicate years of isolation in our current society.  This made me think of how we have developed so many other ways of communication and literacy other than just verbal.  In fact, electronic communication is now preferred.

I remember learning to dial and use a telephone as a kid.  When I made friends at school, I would write down my friends numbers and memorize them.  Back then, a phone number was an identity, as common as a last name.  Now, this is true of social media names (as I wrote about in an earlier blog).  I no longer have phone numbers memorized because there are too many of them to keep track of.  I also don’t call anyone as often. In fact, I’m often met with shock if I call rather than text.  In this sense, the ability to read and write is an absolute necessity.

I do not read or write for myself.  I read and write so I can communicate with others.  It is not an individual pursuit anymore.  As a kid I wanted to learn to read for the sake of books and literature.  If I had never learned to read, I’d be a social outcast now.  It’s key to fitting in because computers and electronic technology run communications and require this ability.  As Baron wrote, “the computer is simply the latest step in a long line of writing technologies.”  Literacy and communication is it’s primary function.

12 Year Old Literacy Is Mostly Sarcasm

12 Year Old Literacy Is Mostly Sarcasm

I interviewed my 12 year old sister, Chaya, for this assignment.  She started off answering my questions as seriously as she could, but got pretty bored with me after a while.  She started asking more questions toward the end and giving me shorter (more sarcastic) answers.  After reviewing her answers, I couldn’t help but notice that the ones I asked her about earlier years were answered with more juvenile language.  I think this is because she had to think about things from her 5/ 6 year old perspective, so she used her 5/6 year old vocabulary at times.

Q: When you were growing up, how much school reading and school writing was done with computers?  What kinds of things did you do?  What values did your teachers place on computer literacy?

Chaya: We use the computers all the time.  Mostly for articles and websites though.  We’re not allowed to type our papers.

Me: You’re not allowed to turn in typed papers?

Chaya: No.  They want it all hand written.

Me: Why do you think that is?

Chaya: I don’t know.  I think so we don’t cheat.  Probably just to make it harder.  Whatever, it’s stupid.

 

Q: In the next ten years, what will reading and writing become?  What skills and understandings about online literacy will people need to have?  Why?

Chaya: I don’t understand the question.

Me: Will people still be hand writing in ten years?

Chaya: I don’t think so.  We’ll probably all have iPads or something and write on those.

Me: Why do you think that?

Chaya: Because it’s easier and won’t use paper.  We could totally save the rainforest.  And everything is online or on phones or iPads already anyway.