Reading together

Perusall logoWe’ll use Perusall to annotate and read together.

Instructions for joining on the Assignments page.

 

Calendar

 

Time photoOur course invites you to work with data collection and analysis, readings, and discussion around the field of literacy studies

Tag: literacy

Participatory Classrooms

Participatory Classrooms

Reading in a Participatory Culture  (RIAPC, for the purposes of this blog) draws upon modern understandings of participation and remix to make the argument that Language Arts classrooms should be spaces in which students are encouraged to participate in literature, not just consume it. The book follows the inception, progress, and performance of Ricardo Pitts-Wiley’s play “Moby Dick: Then and Now”, which he wrote with the heavy involvement of students at an urban high school who were reading Moby Dick for the first time. Pitts-Wiley describes the profound way in which his students connected with the book, spurred on by the process of making connections between the themes and characters and real-life, modern scenarios that they were familiar with.

One of my favorite parts of the book was a section which discussed the differences and intersections between remix and appropriation (including stuff such as fan fiction) and notions of plagarism and “stealing”. Interestingly, the authors of RIAPC  hold a view of fanfic – or at least of some fanfic – which was, to me, surprisingly positive. RIAPC draws a meaningful distinction between plagarism and appropriation, and between thoughtful remixes and lazy ones, which I found to be incredibly insightful and useful to anyone considering the use of remixes in their classroom. According to the book, the difference between plagarism and appropriation/remix has to do with credit for ideas. In plagarism, one author takes on the content or ideas of another and attempts to pass them off as his or her own; the original source is purposefully concealed. A remix, however, is open about its original source material; in fact, a really good remix likely depends on it’s reader/viewer’s knowledge of the original source in order to be understood. In this vein, RIAPC indicates that some remixes are better than others. A truly thoughtful remix actually requires a deep understanding of the original work, and will expand on, question, or poke fun at elements of the work in a way which can only come from someone who has read and understood the original. By these standards, some fan fictions can actually be great examples of a thoughtful remix, such as ones which write to fill in a plot hole, who carry on after the story has ended, or who write from a minor character’s perspective. A shallow remix, on the other hand, is one which demonstrates little knowledge of or respect for the original work. I found this section of clarifications really useful, and I think that it would be the start of a great class discussion to hold before my future class begins working on our own remixes!

My only argument with the book is that I would have loved to receive even more real-life advice about diverse, manageable ways to implement these remediation ideas in the classroom. The book focuses primarily (almost-but-not-quite exclusively, in fact) on Pitts-Wiley’s play as an example of a masterful student-designed remix of Melville’s classic. While this example is truly awesome, it is also of an incredibly large scale which probably couldn’t be incorporated as-is into the average English classroom. However, the example of the play does serve as an inspirational reminder of what can happen when students are encouraged and given the freedom to dive into a text and make meaning out of it in a way which is relevant to them.

Old Dogs & New Tricks

Old Dogs & New Tricks

It is a rarely stated but undeniable fact that one major distinguishing features between “cool teachers” and “lame teachers” is their ability (or willingness) to keep up with the times, both in pop culture and in technology. When I was in high school, the features that marked this technological distinction were things such as whether teachers used overhead projectors or used powerpoint; whether they put a contact email or a phone number on their syllabus; whether they showed movies in class or only lectured; whether they owned a cell phone or didn’t.

I remember sitting in Mr. Thomas’ 7th period Physical Science class, watching him and his high-waisted khakis write on the clear overhead projector slides with a dry erase marker, and listening to him bemoan the good ‘ol days of old fashioned respect and honesty and hard work. I remember that we weren’t allowed to type out assignments for his class unless they were longer than a certain number of pages, and I remember that when we wrote our report on one of the elements, we weren’t allowed to use any online sources at all – only books.  I remember that he didn’t listen to music with electric guitars in it, and that he owned a complete copy of the Encyclopedia Brittanica (an edition from sometime in the late 70s or early 80s, if I’m not mistaken), which he kept it on a massive bookshelf that ran along the entire back wall of the classroom, where it loomed, taunting us for our ignorance.

Even stronger than all of these concrete memories is the memory of how I felt in that classroom. Setting aside the fact that it would have been much more useful for us to learn how to seek out up-to-date scientific information than to spend class periods pouring over the encyclopedia, I remember simply not liking Mr. Thomas very much – a fact which made it very difficult to learn from him. Mr. Thomas felt outrageously out-of-touch, as if there was no plane of existence on which he and I could relate to one another. More than anything else, though, I didn’t like Mr. Thomas because I perceived that he didn’t like me. The fact that he verbally identified me as one of his favorite students didn’t quite stand up against the fact that he hadn’t seen or read or frequently even heard of any of the books, movies, shows, or music that my adolescent heart felt so passionately about — or, worse yet, that he often expressed contempt for the ones he had heard of. The fact that he would call on me often in class meant little in the face of the knowledge that I was a part of the delinquent generation of young people who only cared about texting and IM and MTV and sex and MySpace and skinny jeans and skateboarding and all other evil things. I remember feeling kind of bad for him when someone in class would make a sarcastic joke rooted in pop culture, and he would greet our chorused laughter with the confused blank stare of someone who is always left out of the joke. I remember looking at Mr. Thomas and being genuinely baffled that someone who spends so much time with teenagers could live on such an utterly and completely distant planet from them.

It was not until this past year or so that I began to realize that I actually face the legitimate risk of becoming one of those out-of-touch teachers myself. (This realization probably made me feel older than anything else ever has.) Interacting with my 14-year-old sister Amanda constantly reminds me how quickly digital technology and pop culture change — even though, at 25, I am younger than any of Amanda’s schoolteachers, I fear that I may have more in common with them than I do with her in terms of digital literacy! This may be an exaggeration, and I hope it is. But I am genuinely staggered at the gap between her digital abilities and my own, and, additionally, by the extent to which I am just totally not up on what is cool these days. While pop culture may seem like a random thing to bring into this discussion, I believe it’s relevant; after all, it’s amazing (and a little depressing) how much my lack of appreciation for One Direction and Adventuretime impedes my abilities to relate to my sister, especially when you compare me to my 19-year-old sister Aubrey, who is well versed in both of these topics and thus shares a large number of interests and inside jokes with Amanda.

I think there is something weirdly, deeply significant about a teacher’s ability to relate (or, at the very least, to make an attempt to relate) to the contemporary pop culture that their students care about, as well as to strive to gain skills in current digital technology and incorporate them in the classroom. The older we get, the more work this will take. But if you think about it, as teachers, we will have the massive advantage of spending time with dozens of young people every day. If we learn to value their expertises and interests instead of belittling them, and learn from them instead of just talking at them, I venture to suggest that we will greatly lessen our risk of becoming the Mr. Thomases of the future. :)

Another Literacy Narrative

Another Literacy Narrative

Although the assignment recommended that we interview an older or younger person, I decided to ignore this suggestion and interview my husband, Ben. I did this because in addition to the fact that he is my favorite person, Ben has actually had a kind of weird and super interesting life. Even though he and I are the same age (25) and grew up in the same hometown, our lifelong literacy experiences are almost totally opposite of one another.

One of the areas in which Ben’s experiences were the most different from many other people our age was in the area of computer literacy.  His dad, a Vietnam veteran who battled PTSD, OCD and other mental and emotional difficulties, had some strong opinions about computers which created a unique experience for Ben and his siblings. When I asked him what sort of value his parents placed on computer literacy, he snorted:

“Ha…Yeah. Computers were definitely discouraged by my dad. I remember there was a program through the charter school and they gave our family a free computer for our house. I think they gave it to us so we could use it for research and homework and stuff, but my dad wouldn’t let us get internet, so it turned out there wasn’t a lot we could do with it.”

When I asked why his dad wouldn’t let them get internet, Ben hesitated before answering: “Because computers were…I don’t remember, but it was something totally crazy, like they were the Mark of the Beast or something. For real!  It was like the internet was Skynet from The Terminator movies. He thought we were going to become dependent on them or…something about the government spying on us through the computers and knowing where we were and stuff. So we were really only able to use Word and stuff on our computer at home. I’d never had internet before, so at first I didn’t really know the difference. But it was kind of a bummer that we really never used the computer to its full capacity.”

I asked Ben how this lack of internet affected him in school. He recalled that once he got to high school, he and his sisters “had to walk 3 miles down Greenhorn Road [a narrow, windy mountain road with no sidewalk or bike lane] to our neighbor’s house to use a computer for school assignments. It was really a pain. I was pretty mad at our dad that he would let us walk that far but wouldn’t just let us get internet.”

When Ben was a junior in high school, his parents divorced, and he and two of his sisters temporarily went to live with a family friend named Pam. It was there, at age 16, that Ben finally had the internet at his disposal. “It was so awesome to just be able to do homework in my room”, he told me. “We actually had our own computer and dial-up line just for the kids. I learned how to use instant messenger and MySpace, and because of that I started writing more. I remember specifically that that was the first time I really learned how to type, because I was using IM to talk to my friends. It made me learn to type a lot faster.”

Facebook Fails

Facebook Fails

While the language of Mary Hamilton’s article was pretty dry and academic, I found the information to be really helpful in figuring out how to choose and analyze an image of a literacy event. Even though we’ve already kind of discussed this in class, I appreciated the way that Hamilton went out of her way at the beginning of the article to clarify that modern literacy studies have more to do with social practice and institutions with embedded literacy than with simple reading and writing. I’m one of the people who had no idea what “literacy studies” even meant when I enrolled in this class, so I am still getting used to thinking of literacy studies in this way!

The image that I chose to analyse for this assignment is a screenshot that I took of a web page entitled “Facebook Fails”. Just like many other similar sites, this Tumblr is devoted to posting stupid things that other people write on Facebook, and creating a platform for people to make fun of them. It’s pretty difficult to read the original post in this picture, but if you click on it you should be able to make it bigger!

Screenshot_2015-01-29-12-50-30 (1)

There are obviously two layers to this literacy event: the original post, which is a bio from a Facebook page, and the fact that this piece of text has been re-posted with accompanying judgmental commentary onto the Facebook Fails Tumblr. This puts it into the category of “Interactions between people and texts” from the article. Other than this, though, I don’t feel like this literacy event fits very comfortably into any of the other literacy types mentioned in Hamilton’s article. The act of belittling another person’s perceived literary ability or intelligence might be categorized as a sort of “Literacy as Display” – one could assume that the person making fun of the original text is making a statement about their own literacy abilities by mocking and distancing themselves from the original post. But this would be a stretch from Hamilton’s definition of “Literacy as Display”, which she describes in the article as having more to do with words and logos that create a group identity. Perhaps this event could be labelled something like “Literacy as Status Determiner” or “Literacy as Social Filter”. I’m not particularly satisfied with either of these titles, but I’m trying to get at something which encapsulates the way that people can infer what “type of person” someone is based upon their writing style and perceived ability or intelligence. (As in the case of the commenter in the image, who writes “Your bio is so informative and intelligent. I can honestly say I hate you.”) I would be interested to hear what others think about this image. What kind of title do you think we could put on it that would help us understand what is going on here?

I’m a Bibliophile…

I’m a Bibliophile…

Reading-Quote-reading-30488783-500-406

Hello!! I’m Celina. I’m a second year student majoring in English Studies here at Chico State. I’m from Oroville, so I commute everyday to and from school. I’m an introvert, I really like spending time alone, you know, personal time. I’m a Mormon, the second oldest of eight kids and yes, I’m Hmong. Within this large family of mine, the only way I feel like I could escape was to read. I also rely on photography to free my mind. I’m very bad at keeping diaries or daily journal entries, so I do this by taking pictures (and uploading them onto Facebook, Instagram) as often as I can.

I got interested in reading due to an Accelerated Reading Contest in grade school. At first, my target was to get the highest AR points and be on the highest reading level. Eventually, I gradually got myself into several books that sparked my interest (Babysitters Club, Nancy Drew, Boxcar Children, Magic Tree House, etc.) in reading for my own pleasure. As old as I am now, I enjoy reading a variety of genres ranging from thrillers to the cheesiest romance novels. I love books. I read all the time! I had a neat size collection that I’ve compiled over the years, but I had to give them up as I was running out of room for new books.

tumblr_m1idj8LS0U1qkmogjo1_500

From reading Szwed’s article, I found a lot of interesting statements that I do agree with. One of the many was the fact that literacy cannot be judged on a single standard. I find that every individual has their own way of approaching reading. For example, I like reading books whereas my brother likes to research and watch documentaries. Several people has told him that he’s never going to succeed if all he does is surf the internet on his iPhone all day. The first thing that came to my mind was that it’s wrong. Again, literacy cannot be based on a single standard. I’m confident that my brother is intelligent enough to know how to read in the first place, navigate his phone and understand whatever it is that he researches.

One thing that I was really offended by while I was growing up was receiving a certificate for passing or excelling the state standardized english proficiency test in third grade. I felt proud, but at the same time mad that such an award was given. I felt that it wasn’t fair that I wasn’t treated as an equal to my fellow classmates. I attended pre-school, went to kindergarten, and had a childhood like everyone else, why pick or make it that apparent just because I am Hmong? I really dislike all these standards several think that can determine one’s abilities…

We also discussed ‘code switching’ in class. I can relate to this. I feel that a lot of people who are bilingual often are told that they are either fluent or they’re not. Growing up learning and speaking two languages never bothered as I am fluent in both Hmong and English, reading and writing. I do sometimes mix English and Hmong together when I speak a majority of the time, and when I do so, some people think that I have a hard time speaking one language. Please, I aced my English classes growing up! I even took senior AP English Literature as a Junior in highschool!  I would feel better if it was acknowledged that I have the abilities to speak two languages, not counting conversational Spanish and a little Japanese. ;)

 

Thank you for taking the time, if you’ve made it this far, to read my rants and what-not. Bye!!

 

~~Celina.

il_340x270.682505797_gzu1